”
Option #1 and Option #2: Project Management SimulationReview the description of the two simulation options in the Module 8 folder and complete the option that aligns with the Portfolio Project option you selected and have been working on.The project management simulation assignment consists of two parts.Part 1: The Simulation ExperienceRun the simulation, trying various what-if assessments to obtain a better score and complete the designated scenario. In doing so, you will benefit from running the sessions using different options and trying different action items to experience various project challenges. After completing the simulation session for the designated scenario, capture a screen image of the confirmation page showing your total score for the scenario.For Option #1: The simulation experience comprises Scenario A; or,For Option #2: The simulation experience comprises Scenario B.Simulation Link: Project Management Simulation: Scope, Resources, Schedule V2 (Links to an external site.) (Product #: 4700-HTM-ENG)Part 2: EssayAfter completing the simulation, write an essay that addresses the following elements based on the simulation scenario that you performed. (This part is common to both project and assignment options.)Present an overview of the simulation scenario.Explain the intent of the simulation scenario.Relate at least three PMBOK® Guide standards or practices applied in the simulation scenario. Describe your lessons learned based on the what-if assessments. Explain how the methods applied to audit and terminate projects are used to capture lessons learned.Describe how the simulation experience can be used to enter (or advance) your career as a project manager.Describe how proficiency in the use of a project management systems as demonstrated in the PMS Resource Center can be applied to enter (or advance) your career as a project manager.Additional InstructionsProperly organize your writing by including the following:Cover pageIntroductionBody of your work in response to the assignment’s key elements, with headings and subheadingsConclusionList of referencesAppendices—containing captured screen image of the confirmation page showing your total simulation score for each scenario performed.The introduction through conclusion sections of your essay should be approximately 4-5 pages in length. Support your assignment with a minimum of three scholarly references. The CSU-Global library is a good place to locate these sources. The written section should follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)standards. Consult the Sample Paper (Links to an external site.) template for more information on how to organize the paper and review the rubric for specific grading criteria.RubricPJM500 Mod 6 CTPJM500 Mod 6 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements15.0 to >12.0 ptsIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >9.0 ptsIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.9.0 to >6.0 ptsIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.6.0 to >0 ptsIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSimulation Performance15.0 to >12.0 ptsScreen image is included with the assignment submission indicating successful completion of the simulation with a score of at least 900 points.12.0 to >9.0 ptsScreen image is included with the assignment submission indicating satisfactory completion of the simulation with a score of at least 700 points and below 900.9.0 to >6.0 ptsScreen image is included with the assignment submission indicating unsatisfactory completion of the simulation with a score of at least 500 points and below 700.6.0 to >0 ptsScreen image is not included with the assignment submission or does not indicate completion of the simulation with a score below 500.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 to >16.0 ptsDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of PMBOK® Guide standards or practices as applied in the simulation scenario; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.16.0 to >12.0 ptsSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12.0 to >8.0 ptsMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.8.0 to >0 ptsFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis20.0 to >16.0 ptsProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the simulation experience, lessons learned, and the impact of these lessons on a project manager career.16.0 to >12.0 ptsSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.12.0 to >8.0 ptsMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.8.0 to >0 ptsFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples10.0 to >8.0 ptsSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.8.0 to >6.0 ptsSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.6.0 to >4.0 ptsSources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.4.0 to >0 ptsSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.10.0 to >8.0 ptsProject is clearly organized, well written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.8.0 to >6.0 ptsProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.6.0 to >4.0 ptsProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.4.0 to >0 ptsProject is not organized or well written, and is not in the proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >8.0 ptsProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.8.0 to >6.0 ptsFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.6.0 to >4.0 ptsSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.4.0 to >0 ptsNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.
Let our team of professional writers take care of your essays for you! We provide quality and plagiarism free academic papers written from scratch. Sit back, relax, and leave the writing to us! Meet some of our best research paper writing experts. We obey strict privacy policies to secure every byte of information between you and us.
WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For MeORDER ORIGINAL ANSWERS WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH
